Author: azeeadmin

09 Apr 2021

Facebook takes down 16,000 groups trading fake reviews after another poke by UK’s CMA

Facebook has removed 16,000 groups that were trading fake reviews on its platform after another intervention by the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the regulator said today.

The CMA has been leaning on tech giants to prevent their platforms being used as thriving marketplaces for selling fake reviews since it began investigating the issue in 2018 — pressuring both eBay and Facebook to act against fake review sellers back in 2019.

The two companies pledged to do more to tackle the insidious trade last year, after coming under further pressure from the regulator — which found that Facebook-owned Instagram was also a thriving hub of fake review trades.

The latest intervention by the CMA looks considerably more substantial than last year’s action — when Facebook removed a mere 188 groups and disabled 24 user accounts. Although it’s not clear how many accounts the tech giant has banned and/or suspended this time it has removed orders of magnitude more groups. (We’ve asked.)

Facebook was contacted with questions but it did not answer what we asked directly, sending us this statement instead:

“We have engaged extensively with the CMA to address this issue. Fraudulent and deceptive activity is not allowed on our platforms, including offering or trading fake reviews. Our safety and security teams are continually working to help prevent these practices.”

Since the CMA has been raising the issue of fake review trading, Facebook has been repeatedly criticised for not doing enough to clean up its platforms, plural.

Today the regulator said the social media giant has made further changes to the systems it uses for “identifying, removing and preventing the trading of fake and/or misleading reviews on its platforms to ensure it is fulfilling its previous commitments”.

It’s not clear why it’s taken Facebook well over a year — and a number of high profile interventions — to dial up action against the trade in fake reviews. But the company suggested that the resources it has available to tackle the problem had been strained as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated impacts, such as home working. (Facebook’s full year revenue increased in 2020 but so too did its expenses.)

According to the CMA changes Facebook has made to its system for combating traders of fake reviews include:

  • suspending or banning users who are repeatedly creating Facebook groups and Instagram profiles that promote, encourage or facilitate fake and misleading reviews
  • introducing new automated processes that will improve the detection and removal of this content
  • making it harder for people to use Facebook’s search tools to find fake and misleading review groups and profiles on Facebook and Instagram
  • putting in place dedicated processes to make sure that these changes continue to work effectively and stop the problems from reappearing

Again it’s not clear why Facebook would not have already been suspending or banning repeat offenders — at least, not if it was actually taking good faith action to genuinely quash the problem, rather than seeing if it could get away with doing the bare minimum.

Commenting in a statement, Andrea Coscelli, chief executive of the CMA, essentially makes that point, saying: “Facebook has a duty to do all it can to stop the trading of such content on its platforms. After we intervened again, the company made significant changes — but it is disappointing it has taken them over a year to fix these issues.”

“We will continue to keep a close eye on Facebook, including its Instagram business. Should we find it is failing to honour its commitments, we will not hesitate to take further action,” Coscelli added.

A quick search on Facebook’s platform for UK groups trading in fake reviews appears to return fewer obviously dubious results than when we’ve checked in on this problem in 2019 and 2020. Although the results that were returned included a number of private groups so it was not immediately possible to verify what content is being solicited from members.

We did also find a number of Facebook groups offering Amazon reviews intended for other European markets, such as France and Spain (and in one public group aimed at Amazon Spain we found someone offering a “fee” via PayPal for a review; see below screengrab) — suggesting Facebook isn’t applying the same level of attention to tackling fake reviews that are being traded by users in markets where it’s faced fewer regulatory pokes than it has in the UK.

Screengrab: TechCrunch

09 Apr 2021

Cleo Capital is targeting $20 million for Fund II

Cleo Capital, a venture capital firm founded in 2018 by Sarah Kunst, is raising up to $20 million for its second fund, according to a source familiar with the matter. A recent SEC filing shows that Cleo Capital has already raised $6.7 million of that goal, bringing total assets under management to around $10 million. Kunst was unable to comment on her fundraising efforts.

That new AUM number is close to what Cleo Capital initially set out to do. When Kunst first launched her firm, she targeted a $10 million close. She ended up closing $3.14 million of that goal, and now, she’s back to double down.

Fund II’s $20 million target, if closed, would allow Cleo Capital, which invests in primarily pre-seed companies, to start leading rounds. The firm has already been writing $1 million checks and targets about a 15-20% ownership in its rounds.

“One of the reasons why we are a pre-seed fund is because in seed, especially late-seed, you have everyone from family offices to TikTok stars and rolling funds competing for hot rounds,” she said. “No one is competing in pre-seed.”

There are firms such as Precursor and Hustle Fund that back pre-seed companies, and cut checks around $100,000 and $25,000 to start, respectively. Kunst sees the ability to write a $1 million pre-seed check as a “huge advantage.” Usually early-stage founders without family money or deep networks have to spend a big chunk of time raising their first round. It’s a lot of time to spend fundraising and not building a company. If a firm can cut a big pre-seed check, she thinks that Cleo is “buying back six months of a company‘s runway,” she said.

Like many firms, Cleo Capital has turned to creative measures to diversify deal flow in the era of Zoom investing and pandemic business. For example, Cleo Capital launched a fellowship program for laid off workers during COVID-19 to promote entrepreneurship.

Matt Pauker, a repeat founder who has sold companies to Coinbase and HP Enterprise, was one of the advisors of that program. Pauker has joined Cleo Capital as a general partner presumably to line up with the timing of Fund II.

While the firm has no racial or gender investment focus, about 92% of its current investments are companies started by underrepresented founders.

The firm’s portfolio includes Planet FWD, mmhmm, Lunch Club, and StyleSeat. As for new opportunities, Kunst says that Cleo Capital is looking at anything that helps the individual turn into a collective. With the growth of the creator economy and solo-entrepreneurs, people need to figure out the future of income, health care, and benefit, Kunst explained.

“All of these things are hard for people to do as an individual,” she said. The majority of Cleo Capital’s portfolio is based outside of Silicon Valley.

Cleo Capital’s raise comes just over a week after two venture capital firms founded by Black venture capitalists announced new funds, Harlem Capital and MaC Venture Capital.

09 Apr 2021

Amazon defeats warehouse union push, RWDSU challenges results

Efforts to unionize Amazon’s Bessemer, Alabama warehouse were defeated by a wide margin in the second day of vote counting. More than half of the 3,215 votes cast broke in in factor of the retailer. The Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, which would have served as the workers’ union, had the vote past, was quick to challenge the results.

RWDSU President Stuart Appelbaum said in a statement offered to TechCrunch,

Amazon has left no stone unturned in its efforts to gaslight its own employees. We won’t let Amazon’s lies, deception and illegal activities go unchallenged, which is why we are formally filing charges against all of the egregious and blatantly illegal actions taken by Amazon during the union vote. Amazon knew full well that unless they did everything they possibly could, even illegal activity, their workers would have continued supporting the union.

That’s why they required all their employees to attend lecture after lecture, filled with mistruths and lies, where workers had to listen to the company demand they oppose the union. That’s why they flooded the internet, the airwaves and social media with ads spreading misinformation. That’s why they brought in dozens of outsiders and union-busters to walk the floor of the warehouse. That’s why they bombarded people with signs throughout the facility and with text messages and calls at home. And that’s why they have been lying about union dues in a right to work state. Amazon’s conduct has been despicable.

This initial defeat represents a large setback in the biggest unionization push in Amazon’s 27 year history. What might have represented a sea change for both the retail giant and blue collar tech workers has, for now, been fairly soundly defeated.

Amazon has, of course, long insisted that it treats workers fairly, making such union efforts unnecessary. The company cites such standards as a $15 an hour minimum wage, a factor the company initial pushed back on, but ultimately instated after pressure from legislators.

Breaking….

09 Apr 2021

Mortgage is suddenly sexy as SoftBank pumps $500M in Better.com at $6B valuation

Digital mortgage lender Better.com has raised a $500 million round from Japanese investment conglomerate SoftBank that values the company at $6 billion.

The financing is notable for a few reasons. For one, that new $6 billion valuation,  is up 50% from the $4 billion it was valued at last November when it raised $200 million in Series D financing. It’s also up tenfold from its $600 million valuation at the time of its Series C raise in August 2019.

Secondly, it’s further proof that mortgage – a traditionally “unsexy” industry that has long been in need of disruption – is officially hot. For all its controversy, when SoftBank invests, people pay attention.

The COVID-19 pandemic and historically low mortgage rates fueled acceleration in the online lending space in a way that no one could have anticipated. As such, it’s not a big surprise that Better.com has raised $700 million in a matter of months.

The investment brings Better.com’s total funding raised to over $900 million since its 2014 inception.  Other backers include Goldman Sachs, Kleiner Perkins, American Express, Activant Capital and Citi, among others.

According to the Wall Street Journal, SoftBank is buying shares from Better’s existing investors, and agreed to give all of its voting rights to CEO and founder Garg “in a sign of its eagerness” to invest in the company. 

During a one-on-one interview at Lendit Fintech’s USA 2020 virtual event in October, Garg had told me that an IPO was definitely in the works.

“We’ll do it when it’s right,” he said. “One of the core tenets of American capitalism is the ability for your customers to buy your stock.”

At that time, he had also told me that before the pandemic, Better was processing about $1.2 billion a month in loans. But as of October 2020, it was funding over two-and-a-half billion a month of loans and had gone from 1,500 staffers to about 4,000 worldwide. 

“When the pandemic started we were doing less than sort of like $50 million a month of revenue,” he said. “We’re two-and-a half times that now.”

09 Apr 2021

The 2022 Chevrolet Bolt EUV lowers the cost of entry for some of GM’s most advanced tech

The 2022 Chevy Bolt EUV may look like a larger, slightly longer Chevrolet Bolt, but under that boxy exterior lies a whole lot of tech that’s both affordable and very advanced. With the launch of the Chevy Bolt EUV, and its available suite of advanced driver assistance systems, GM is putting both advanced driver assistance technology and electric drivetrains within reach of the masses.

As part of GMs much-touted goal to introduce 30 new electric vehicles in the next four years, the company recently launched an updated Bolt, as well as the all-new Bolt EUV, or Electric Utility Vehicle. I had two separate opportunities to test prototypes of the Bolt EUV with GM’s advanced Super Cruise system.

While the Bolt and Bolt EUV share similar DNA, they are two different vehicles. The EUV is the longer and larger of the two, with more bells and whistles, like Super Cruise: An advanced driver assistance system that allows for hands-free driving on certain highways, available as a $2,200 option. Super Cruise is not available on the 2022 Bolt.

Nuts and bolts

The Bolt EUV is powered by a 288-cell, 65-kWh battery pack that Chevy says makes 200 hp and 266 lb-ft of torque. Chevrolet estimates that the EUV will get 250 miles on a full charge, and when charging on the go, can regain up to 95 miles of range in 30 minutes on a Level 2 charger.

On household power, (specifically 240V) the EUV will take around 7-8 hours to charge up to 100%, which is how Chevy says it expects most consumers will power their crossover. To assist with that, Chevrolet had teamed up with home charging installer Qmerit to offer free charger installation if you buy or lease a new Bolt or EUV. Installation of a home charger can cost as much as $2,000, so it’s a decent incentive.

The Bolt EUV won’t get the upgraded Ultium battery pack and underlying architecture that’s coming on the Hummer EV, Cadillac Lyric and other future GM electric vehicles. Instead, the Bolt EUV is built on the BEV2 architecture, the same one on which the 2021 Bolt is built. As mentioned, it also gets Super Cruise as an optional add-on.

Since Super Cruise’s introduction in 2017, the system has been siloed in Cadillac products, showing up on the 2018 CT6 and finally expanding to the 2021 CT5. The Bolt EUV is the first production vehicle outside of a luxury GM brand to offer the system even as paid upgrade.

The Bolt EUV starts at $33,995, which is $2,500 less than the 2021 Bolt that is sitting on dealer lots today. The 2022 Chevy Bolt ($31,995) is also around $4,500 cheaper than the 2021 Bolt. Chevy’s press department says that the goal is to “make EVs attainable to everyone.” Although this is also likely an effort to bring the new vehicles in line with earlier Bolt models that qualified for the $7,500 federal tax credit. That incentive in the U.S. disappeared after GM sold 200,000 EVs nationwide.

The Launch Edition, which included the optional Super Cruise, a lighted charging port and special badging, carried a sticker price of $43,495. As of this writing, reservations for the Launch Edition are completely full, but you can still reserve an LT or Premier trim in the 2022 Bolt EUV. Super Cruise, however, is only available as a $2,200 option on the Premier trim, which starts at $38,495. Keep in mind, these prices are all before including any state or local tax incentives or rebates for electric vehicles.

In contrast, a Tesla Model Y Long Range model, the most affordable of the bunch since Tesla dropped that vehicle’s base option, starts at $41,990 before incentives. Getting Tesla’s so called Full-Self Driving feature — which is not self-driving and is actually a driver assistance system — will cost you an additional $10,000.

User experience: Super Cruise

Super Cruise, while impressive, tends to err on the side of caution when it comes to implementing the technology. The system allows for drivers to take their hands and feet off the controls on more than 200,000 miles of mapped divided highway all over the country.

“If we can bring congestion and crashes to zero, then developing fully-autonomous driving is worth it,” Jeremy Short, the vehicle chief engineer who is responsible for the engineering, development, validation, testing and manufacturing of the Bolt EUV, said during my second time with the crossover. “The next 10 years are going to get really interesting in the autonomy space. Five years ago, would you have thought we would have what we have now with Super Cruise?”

That being said, Super Cruise isn’t perfect, and GM continues to iterate the product, even on the Bolt EUV. During my first drive in a Bolt EUV prototype from Marina Del Rey to Burbank and back in peak Los Angeles rush hour traffic, Super Cruise seemed a little bit “off.” The system ping-ponged in the wide lanes on the highway. When the vehicle was moving under 30 mph, the system lost track of the lane markings on mapped highways like the extremely busy 405, causing it to drift toward the other lanes and switch off a number of times.

2022 Chevrolet Bolt EUV

2022 Chevrolet Bolt EUV. Image Credits: GM

A few weeks later, on a second prototype drive that followed a 50-mile loop originating in Carson, the system appeared to have gained its sea legs. However, both Short, who was following in another prototype vehicle, and I noted that Super Cruise in the EUV still had problems when traffic slowed below 10 mph. When cars ahead slowed, the EUV would slow appropriately, but then begin to drift across the lane once traffic moved forward, as if it had lost the lane markings. Eventually, the alert to take over would sound and Super Cruise would shut off.

“I did notice some ping-ponging at low speeds,” Short said after our drive. He then joked that it will require some more engineers driving that stretch of road to teach the system to navigate it without bouncing around the lane. He also said that speed and California’s strange concrete roadbeds (they have textured surfaces that can look like lane markings to AI) can affect Super Cruise. “Think of it like tracer fire; the more data you have coming in, the more accurate the car can be.”

Short says that the Super Cruise system is continually learning and updating — even if it’s fully baked on vehicles like the CT5 and CT6. Every time Super Cruise is added to a new vehicle, the sensors, software and processing needs to be updated and tweaked because each car has different weights, potential speeds, dimensions, steering and braking, space for sensors and features. For example, you will be able to get a version of Super Cruise on the 2022 Cadillac Escalade which includes automatic lane changing features. The 2022 Bolt EUV, however, doesn’t get those sensors and therefore can’t automatically change lanes.

“Each vehicle that has Super Cruise implemented has different anatomy so it needs to process and do different things,” Short said. “The Super Cruise on the Bolt EUV was developed at the same time that engineers were developing it on the Escalade. There’s very different steering and braking in each car so the two systems are different.”

Super Cruise qualifies as an advanced Level 2 autonomous vehicle. As the driver, you still have to remain alert, and attentive, but you can remove your hands from the steering wheel and your feet from the pedals on roads where Super Cruise is available. Sensors embedded in the steering wheel track your eyes (even at night or when you’re wearing dark sunglasses) to ensure that you are paying attention to the road ahead and not watching a movie, napping or glancing at your phone. The system doesn’t give you much leeway to take your eyes off the road while using Super Cruise, either. At 65 mph, you can reach over and change the radio station on the 10.2-inch infotainment screen but alarms will sound if you look away for more than just a few seconds.

“If you were on a long drive from Los Angeles to Las Vegas,” Short explained after I asked about it, “you’d essentially be a front passenger. Both you and your passenger would be looking down the road, keeping your eyes up for any potential issues. When I did that trip with a friend and used Super Cruise, I felt the same level of fatigue that he did, which is to say, not much.”

The other bells and whistles

We haven’t had the typical full week to test the 2022 Bolt EUV to fully evaluate. However, there was enough time to evaluate some of the vehicle’s features.

Chevy’s new onboard infotainment and navigation system runs on the company’s Infotainment 3 software. The system’s voice control, which has natural language processing, allowed me to do a quick search to find local charging stations.

The drawback? The system brought up a number of charging stations, but didn’t indicate which ones were available, in service, out of service, or if they were part of the EvGo system, the charging company that GM has partnered with. Driver’s also can’t page through results while using Super Cruise because the driver monitoring system will notice that their eyes aren’t on the road ahead.

In order to find EvGo chargers, owners need to use the myChevrolet App to locate the chargers and then send the directions to the navigation system. While driving, the system does lock out some features, and Short notes that you won’t be able to flip through pages of apps.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out once we get more time in the EUV. That being said, it’s not likely to be as seamless as the Tesla charging experience.

At its core, the 2022 Chevrolet Bolt EUV offers some of the most advanced driver assistance technology on the market in an EV package for an attainable price. After spending two separate four-hour stints in prototype versions of the EUV, it’s clear that this compact SUV has the space, power and high-tech capability that will allow it to go head-to-head with the likes of the Tesla Model Y, Volvo’s XC40 Recharge, Ford’s Mach-E and Volkswagen’s ID.4.

09 Apr 2021

Last call for Detroit startups to apply for TechCrunch’s Detroit City Spotlight pitch-off

TechCrunch is hosting a small virtual event on April 15 for startups in Detroit and we’re still looking for a few startups to pitch at the event. The deadline is today, Friday, April 9th. Apply below. Want to attend the free event? Register here.

TechCrunch just published a feature on Detroit-darling StockX and this meetup will feature those involved in producing that content. The EC-1 can be found here.

Everyone is welcome to attend the event, but we’re looking for startups based in Michigan’s southeast region to pitch at this event. TechCrunch has a long history of hosting small pitch-offs and we’re excited to revive this tradition despite the need to do it virtually.

Not in Michigan? No worries. We’re spinning up similar events in other regions too. Spoiler: Pittsburgh is next.

Qualifications

  • Early-stage startups (Series A or earlier)
  • Startups based in the Detroit region will be given priority
  • Pitch decks are highly recommended
  • Apply for the pitch-off here

The event is online and free, but space is limited. Register early. We hope you can make it.

09 Apr 2021

Creator economy’s slow burn

Hello and welcome back to Equity, TechCrunch’s venture capital-focused podcast, where we unpack the numbers behind the headlines.

Natasha and Danny and  and Grace were all here to chat through the week’s rigamarole of news. Alex took some well-deserved time off, but that meant we got to poke a little fun at him and create a Special Edition segment to start off the show.

Jokes aside, this week was yet another spree of creator economy, edtech, and new fund announcements, with fresh and unexpected news hailing from Natasha’s home state, New Jersey.

Here’s what we got into:

What a show! We’ll be back with the full trio next week, and until then, stay safe and thank you for listening.

Equity drops every Monday at 7:00 a.m. PST, Wednesday, and Friday at 6:00 AM PST, so subscribe to us on Apple PodcastsOvercastSpotify and all the casts!

09 Apr 2021

6 VCs talk the future of Austin’s exploding startup ecosystem

For years now, a growing number of tech companies — large and small — have either relocated their headquarters to Austin or opened another office or campus in the Texas capital. They’ve been drawn to the city for a number of factors, including its laid-back lifestyle, no state tax, a business-friendly environment and lower cost of living (for now).

The impact on the city’s startup ecosystem is noticeable in the growing number of entrepreneurs (many of whom worked at some of the tech giants who have a big presence in the city) and investors calling Austin home.

Most recently, Tesla’s plans to build a gigafactory in the city and Oracle’s announcement that it was relocating its headquarters here have made national headlines.

The comparisons to the Bay Area abound — from the burgeoning and maturing startup scene to an overheated and competitive housing market.

All the while, venture capitalists see several key areas of opportunities. At one point, Austin was once a big enterprise software city. While software is still big here, a number of other sectors are growing including CPG (consumer packaged goods) and real estate tech, among others.

What follows is a survey of some of the top VCs in the city and their projections about the growth of Austin’s ecosystem.

Here’s who we spoke to:

  • Eric Engineer, S3 Ventures
  • Morgan Flager, Silverton Partners
  • Joshua Baer, Capital Factory
  • Carey Smith, Unorthodox Ventures
  • Krishna Srinivasan, LiveOak Venture Partners
  •  Zaz Floreani, Next Coast Ventures

Where do you see Austin’s startup scene five years from now? The city has attracted a wide range of people over the years, including more big tech and startups very recently. How will it add up to something more than the sum of the parts?

Eric Engineer of S3 Ventures believes that by 2030, the Texas startup ecosystem could be the country’s second largest.

“Tech ecosystems benefit from virtuous cycles. As more talented people move to Texas, more capital will follow them, which will then attract more talent, and so on,” he said.

Morgan Flager of 16-year-old Silverton Partners says since Silverton’s inception more than 16 years ago, the state’s largest VC firm has always bet on Austin and, more broadly, on Texas.

“We’ve always felt that if Austin wins, we win, and that’s how we’ve run our business,” he says. “But we are just one organization, and now we are joined by many others who are also betting on Austin and want to do their part to make this ecosystem better…Moving forward, a critical component of success is fostering this existing philosophy of community collaboration, which has already played a part in making Austin such an attractive place to be. Austin is a place where people want to succeed by helping their community succeed, and they aren’t willing to sacrifice the former for the latter. If we continue to hold on to that core philosophy as we grow, we’re in for an amazing future.”

Joshua Baer of Capital Factory believes that in 5 years from now, Austin will have gone from “up and coming” to “arrived” and from the top of the Tier 2 cities to a competitive Tier 1 city. Two of the big signs of this, he predicted, will be a new cohort of Austin unicorns from the likes of Aceable, Apptronik, Disco, Eagle Eye, Everlywell, ICON, and Zen Business combined with big Series A funding rounds of the likes the city has not seen since the days when there was only one big VC firm in town called Austin Ventures.

Unorthodox Ventures Founding Contrarian Carey Smith hesitates to predict, noting that it’s hard enough just to characterize the scene as it is right now.

“There are so many companies of so many different sizes doing so many different things, and there isn’t really a unifying characteristic beyond growth and innovation. It really could go any direction,” he says.

LiveOak Ventures’ Srinivasa points out that Texas has tremendous number of Fortune 500 companies and, as a result, folks with deep domain in major industries such as energy, healthcare, real estate, hospitality and retail.

“This domain knowledge when cross-pollinated with the surging tech talent from big tech and startups has already had a multiplicative effect and is further accelerating entrepreneurial activity,” he said. Besides big tech talent and the continued maturation of the current startup ecosystem that is already underway, we will all continue to spawn an even greater number of incredible category leaders in the years to come. As such, we feel the Austin startup scene is poised to grow faster than ever before.”

Floreani of Next Coast Ventures projects that in five years, Austin will see signs of a maturity of the current market with potentially half a dozen unicorns and half a dozen startups finally going public.

Remote work is pushing and pulling the global workforce. This means that some offices will disappear from Austin, even with more companies moving in, but also more locals who work remotely for companies elsewhere. How do you see these factors impacting the city’s tech evolution?

Eric Engineer of S3 Ventures says that talented people are choosing Austin because of all it has to offer from a lifestyle perspective – not just the job. He believes remote work could ease some of Austin’s growing pains as workers will commute fewer days per week. That will give the city more time to develop the additional transportation infrastructure it needs to handle the continued growth, Engineer said.

Silverton Partners’ Flager thinks remote work shifts the playing field some because it allows workers more choice with respect to where they want to live versus where they have to live to get the job they want.  And while it will give people more freedom and make certain things we do more efficient, he thinks most roles will require a hybrid solution where remote work is complemented by in-person interactions. “Thankfully, Austin has both — it is a desirable place to live and it has a rapidly growing tech community,” he said. “This is part of the reason we’re seeing such an influx of talent moving here at the moment.”

Joshua Baer believes that when people can work anywhere, they won’t actually work everywhere. He thinks there will be big winners that attract much more talent than other places, and that Austin will be one of the biggest winners in the tech migration of the next 5 years. “More companies will move their headquarters here, and more people will choose to work here for offices that have headquarters elsewhere,” he predicts.

Remote work doesn’t work for Unorthodox Ventures’ Carey Smith and he doesn’t believe it will work for Austin long-term. When he briefly worked from home at the start of the pandemic, he felt far less connected to the people I work with — and yet was even busier as remote work added “so much difficulty to even simple tasks.”

“I really thrive with face-to-face meetings and appreciate the hustle and bustle of the office. It keeps all of us motivated,” Smith said. “In short, it’s the lubricant that keeps my wheels turning, and I think it’s required to keep driving innovation in Austin.”

What industry sectors do you focus on within Austin (and beyond)? What is happening in Austin now that you’re most excited to fund?

Over the past 15 years, S3 Ventures has primarily investing in B2B software companies (two-thirds of its portfolio are in this space). But it has also had successful exits in consumer digital experiences and healthcare.

“Texas has an incredibly diverse economy, and so the technology innovation is also broad-based,” Engineer said. “We are seeing huge sectors of the economy (financial services, real estate, health care, education, skilled trades, hospitality, industrial, energy, manufacturing) that were slower to digitize, now start to embrace cloud-based solutions across their entire organizations.”

Silverton Partners has always been a generalist fund. That said, there are several dislocations occurring at the moment that are hard for the firm to ignore, according to Flager. Specifically, he said, there’s rapid disruption in digital health, fintech /insurtech, and education. “The playbooks in these massive industries are being rewritten and we are certainly looking for entrepreneurs who have a strong point of view relative to what the future will look like,” Flager added.

Capital Factory’s Joshua Baer believes the variety of the city’s startup scene is part of what makes it so vibrant. “If it’s hot in tech, it’s happening in Austin,” he said. Some of the areas that have been big recently include artificial intelligence and machine learning, consumer packaged goods, drones, e-commerce, healthcare, marketplaces, robotics and SaaS.

Unorthodox Ventures’ Carey Smith said his firm is focused on investing in companies making tangible products that solve real problems. And unlike many other VCs in the city, and even though it’s a big part of the culture in Austin, he’s not a fan of software. “I prefer the challenge of manufacturing consumer goods,” he said. “Beyond that, software companies lack diversity and only benefit a small sliver of society with the jobs they create. Manufacturing, on the other hand, helps everyone from GEDs to PhDs.”

LiveOak Venture Partners invests across pretty much all industries. In the past year, it has backed companies in proptech, fintech, retail, supply chain, business compliance, cyber security and edtech.

Proptech, in particular, is exciting to LiveOak, and the city has seen success in companies such as Opcity and OJO Labs. Another area with big potential are startups working in legal/compliance. Disco and Mitratech are large companies headquartered in Austin and there are exciting fast growing newcomers like Osano, Eventus and Litlingo.

For Next Coast’s Floreani, the increased number of successful B2C startups in Austin hitting scale is promising “as it cements our talent pool and secret sauce beyond Austin’s early days of being know as a semiconductor and SaaS town.”

“We still have great software entrepreneurs but we also have the DNA to do consumer and media if you consider EverlyWell, Literati, FloSports, Atmosphere, to name a few,” she said.

What are some of the local challenges you’ve encountered or seen founders struggle with? More generally, how should people looking to hire in, invest in, or relocate to Austin think about doing business in the city?

The general consensus among local investors is that Austin’s tech community is welcoming and collaborative and that they all went to serve as a resource to anyone thinking of moving to the city. S3 Ventures’ Engineer said his firm has had several recent transplants from both coasts share how they were pleasantly surprised by this culture – especially compared to what they were used to.

Silverton’s Flager acknowledges that moving is always a challenging event, but moving during COVID is certainly a class of its own.

“I’ve seen some founders struggle with finding strong community ties after relocating to Austin in the midst of a pandemic,” he said. “Almost everything is virtual and that makes integration with a new ecosystem more difficult. Part of my role as an investor and steward of the Austin ecosystem is to facilitate more connectivity within the founder community. As the vaccine rollouts continue and in-person contact becomes safer, Silverton is planning to host a series of community building events to better integrate founders moving here.”

Capitol Factory’s Baer believes Texas investors think about loss prevention more than their peers in Silicon Valley. His advice to companies? Develop two different pitches and know who you are pitching to. “The Texas pitch talks about how you have de-risked the business and the Silicon Valley pitch talks about how big this could be if it works,” he said.

For Unorthodox Ventures’ Smith advises founders to be careful of organizations in Austin or elsewhere that look to help entrepreneurs while “taking equity and not giving enough in return to justify it.”

“Founders need to make sure they are selective about the investors and advisers they take on and that they choose people who offer more than just capital,” he said.

LiveOak Ventures’ Srinivasa warns that people in Austin are not transactional and that if you come across as being transactional and strictly interact with somebody in a transactional way and not a relational way, “it rubs people the wrong way.”

“Outsiders need to be aware of this when they come here,” he said. “When making a hiring decision, it’s important to choose someone who is a good cultural fit, and not hire based solely on resume. From an investor perspective, if you want to do business here, it’s important to focus building strong relationships, besides offering attractive deal terms.”

Next Coast Ventures’ Floreani notes that hiring growth leaders has been a consistent challenge across her firm’s portfolio. “It would be great if Austin had a deeper bench of talented marketing and sales leaders,” she said.

Who are key startup people you see creating success locally, whether investors, founders or even other types of startup ecosystems roles like lawyers, designers, growth experts, etc. We’re trying to highlight the movers and shakers who outsiders might not know.

S3: Founders/CEOs – Leo Resig (Atmosphere), Jag Bath (Favor), Kim Rodriguez (Acessa), Doug Donovan (Interplay Learning), Richard Lebovitz (LeanDNA), Adelle Archer (Eterneva), Andy Ambrose (LiveOak Technology), Adam Berman (TVA Medical), Dion Cornett (Liquibase)

Investors – Rosa McCormick (Wild Basin), Oksana Malysheva (Sputnik), Adam Lipman (Ecliptic Capital), and Josh Baer / Bryan Chambers (Capital Factory)

Service Providers – Marc Nathan (E/N), John Gump (CBRE), Lathrop Smith (MLR), Austin Willis (SVB), Paul O’Brien (Mediatech)

Silverton: Heather Brunner and Jason Cohen @ WP Engine, Chuck Gordon and Mario Feghali @ Sparefoot, Jess Ewing @ Literati, Blake Garrett @Aceable, James Garvey @ Self Financial, Brian Cruver @ Alert Media, John Banczak and T.J. Clark @ TurnKey, Michelle Davey @ Wheel, Rob Taylor @ Convey and several others. 

Capital Factory: http://baer.ly/austinabc

Unorthodox Ventures: Christa Freeland built ATX Kit, a startup that supports more than 40 local food entrepreneurs with her Austin-centric snack boxes.

Bob Bridge and the Southwest Angel Network (SWAN) support startups aiming to solve serious societal challenges, including environmental, health and social justice issues.

LiveOak:  We are fortunate to have many movers and shakers here in our network. We do not wish to include one at the expense of another; that being said, we do want to recognize Dan Graham, who funds social impact startups through Notley Ventures, who has launched a fund to invest in women entrepreneurs, via the BEAM Angel Network and has played an active role in the emergence of CPG. Jim Breyer has been here for only a year and in that period has been an incredible advocate in op-eds, blog posts and interviews for Austin, the local startups and the energy of this town. That has been a big positive addition.

NextCoast Ventures: The founders of these startups have incredible growth plans for Austin: EverlyWell, Upequity, Steadily, Eterneva, Literati, FloSports, and Enboarder. Please note I may be a bit biased here as most of these are companies we have backed.

What do you think of comparisons to Silicon Valley? What impact do you think the influx of (big & small) tech companies is having on the city’s startup scene?

S3’s Engineer believes there is only one Silicon Valley, and that it is highly unlikely there will be anything comparable in the Western world.

But he thinks that while much smaller today, if the trends continue over the next ten years, the Texas ecosystem has a real shot at growing as large, if not larger, than New York and Boston.

Silverton’s Flager was born and raised in Silicon Valley. He went to school there and worked there as well. As a result, he’s not a big fan of the comparison.

“Each place is distinct with different pros and cons,” he said. “Will Austin ever overtake Silicon Valley in terms of size and activity? I really don’t know — we certainly have a long way to go. To some extent, I’m not sure that matters.”

What he does care about is that Austin retains its vibrant character and that its current growth enriches the city, rather than dilutes its energy. “It’s important to recognize that Austin’s culture has not been tech-centric,” Flager said. “Austin is a unique powerhouse of live music, great food, arts, outdoor living and ‘keeping it weird.’ ”

He adds: “As I contemplate what I admire about Silicon Valley and all the things Austin needs to do to be at that level, I tend to spend as much time thinking about what we could do differently.”

Unorthodox Ventures’ Smith believes it’s no surprise that “everyone wants to leave Silicon Valley.

“They finally figured out it’s a disaster,” he said. “As more intelligent, hardworking and curious people gather here, it’s a good thing for Austin and for VCs more broadly. One of the problems with Silicon Valley is that such a strong percentage of VC money stays there or in New York or Boston. We need more capital in Austin and other innovative cities throughout Middle America where we’re solving real problems for the everyday American. As Austin feels more and more influence from Silicon Valley, it’s so important to fund more than tech-oriented projects. Venture capitalists need to focus on basic human needs, too.”

LiveOak’s Srinivasa knows that comparisons to Silicon Valley are inevitable, and for the most part welcome when those comparisons bring broader national and international attention to Austin and reinforces its reputation as a city with a booming startup scene.

“There’s a lot of vibrancy and momentum to the startup scene here that is reminiscent of the early days of Silicon Valley — the growing number businesses being launched, the number of companies being funded, the amount of talent flowing here eager to engrain themselves in the tech community,” he said. “Yet we know there is something unique to Austin that sets it apart from any other tech hub—the collaborative spirit of the people here. There’s also an energy and excitement in this community that’s palpable. Austin has great respect for the successes Silicon Valley has brought forth, and we will incorporate their positive aspects, while forging our own path.”

Next Coast’s Floreani believes that comparison has been overused for a decade. “We are not Silicon Valley and will never be it,” she says. “I am not saying that in a negative sense. I grew up in the Bay Area. I simply believe we grow companies differently here and even though more SV talent and investors are coming to town I don’t think we will suddenly shift to a more Valley like approach to growing companies like blitz-scaling. Rather I think we will find a happy medium that incorporates fast growth and sustainability.”

09 Apr 2021

6 VCs talk the future of Austin’s exploding startup ecosystem

For years now, a growing number of tech companies — large and small — have either relocated their headquarters to Austin or opened another office or campus in the Texas capital. They’ve been drawn to the city for a number of factors, including its laid-back lifestyle, no state tax, a business-friendly environment and lower cost of living (for now).

The impact on the city’s startup ecosystem is noticeable in the growing number of entrepreneurs (many of whom worked at some of the tech giants who have a big presence in the city) and investors calling Austin home.

Most recently, Tesla’s plans to build a gigafactory in the city and Oracle’s announcement that it was relocating its headquarters here have made national headlines.

The comparisons to the Bay Area abound — from the burgeoning and maturing startup scene to an overheated and competitive housing market.

All the while, venture capitalists see several key areas of opportunities. At one point, Austin was once a big enterprise software city. While software is still big here, a number of other sectors are growing including CPG (consumer packaged goods) and real estate tech, among others.

What follows is a survey of some of the top VCs in the city and their projections about the growth of Austin’s ecosystem.

Here’s who we spoke to:

  • Eric Engineer, S3 Ventures
  • Morgan Flager, Silverton Partners
  • Joshua Baer, Capital Factory
  • Carey Smith, Unorthodox Ventures
  • Krishna Srinivasan, LiveOak Venture Partners
  •  Zaz Floreani, Next Coast Ventures

Where do you see Austin’s startup scene five years from now? The city has attracted a wide range of people over the years, including more big tech and startups very recently. How will it add up to something more than the sum of the parts?

Eric Engineer of S3 Ventures believes that by 2030, the Texas startup ecosystem could be the country’s second largest.

“Tech ecosystems benefit from virtuous cycles. As more talented people move to Texas, more capital will follow them, which will then attract more talent, and so on,” he said.

Morgan Flager of 16-year-old Silverton Partners says since Silverton’s inception more than 16 years ago, the state’s largest VC firm has always bet on Austin and, more broadly, on Texas.

“We’ve always felt that if Austin wins, we win, and that’s how we’ve run our business,” he says. “But we are just one organization, and now we are joined by many others who are also betting on Austin and want to do their part to make this ecosystem better…Moving forward, a critical component of success is fostering this existing philosophy of community collaboration, which has already played a part in making Austin such an attractive place to be. Austin is a place where people want to succeed by helping their community succeed, and they aren’t willing to sacrifice the former for the latter. If we continue to hold on to that core philosophy as we grow, we’re in for an amazing future.”

Joshua Baer of Capital Factory believes that in 5 years from now, Austin will have gone from “up and coming” to “arrived” and from the top of the Tier 2 cities to a competitive Tier 1 city. Two of the big signs of this, he predicted, will be a new cohort of Austin unicorns from the likes of Aceable, Apptronik, Disco, Eagle Eye, Everlywell, ICON, and Zen Business combined with big Series A funding rounds of the likes the city has not seen since the days when there was only one big VC firm in town called Austin Ventures.

Unorthodox Ventures Founding Contrarian Carey Smith hesitates to predict, noting that it’s hard enough just to characterize the scene as it is right now.

“There are so many companies of so many different sizes doing so many different things, and there isn’t really a unifying characteristic beyond growth and innovation. It really could go any direction,” he says.

LiveOak Ventures’ Srinivasa points out that Texas has tremendous number of Fortune 500 companies and, as a result, folks with deep domain in major industries such as energy, healthcare, real estate, hospitality and retail.

“This domain knowledge when cross-pollinated with the surging tech talent from big tech and startups has already had a multiplicative effect and is further accelerating entrepreneurial activity,” he said. Besides big tech talent and the continued maturation of the current startup ecosystem that is already underway, we will all continue to spawn an even greater number of incredible category leaders in the years to come. As such, we feel the Austin startup scene is poised to grow faster than ever before.”

Floreani of Next Coast Ventures projects that in five years, Austin will see signs of a maturity of the current market with potentially half a dozen unicorns and half a dozen startups finally going public.

Remote work is pushing and pulling the global workforce. This means that some offices will disappear from Austin, even with more companies moving in, but also more locals who work remotely for companies elsewhere. How do you see these factors impacting the city’s tech evolution?

Eric Engineer of S3 Ventures says that talented people are choosing Austin because of all it has to offer from a lifestyle perspective – not just the job. He believes remote work could ease some of Austin’s growing pains as workers will commute fewer days per week. That will give the city more time to develop the additional transportation infrastructure it needs to handle the continued growth, Engineer said.

Silverton Partners’ Flager thinks remote work shifts the playing field some because it allows workers more choice with respect to where they want to live versus where they have to live to get the job they want.  And while it will give people more freedom and make certain things we do more efficient, he thinks most roles will require a hybrid solution where remote work is complemented by in-person interactions. “Thankfully, Austin has both — it is a desirable place to live and it has a rapidly growing tech community,” he said. “This is part of the reason we’re seeing such an influx of talent moving here at the moment.”

Joshua Baer believes that when people can work anywhere, they won’t actually work everywhere. He thinks there will be big winners that attract much more talent than other places, and that Austin will be one of the biggest winners in the tech migration of the next 5 years. “More companies will move their headquarters here, and more people will choose to work here for offices that have headquarters elsewhere,” he predicts.

Remote work doesn’t work for Unorthodox Ventures’ Carey Smith and he doesn’t believe it will work for Austin long-term. When he briefly worked from home at the start of the pandemic, he felt far less connected to the people I work with — and yet was even busier as remote work added “so much difficulty to even simple tasks.”

“I really thrive with face-to-face meetings and appreciate the hustle and bustle of the office. It keeps all of us motivated,” Smith said. “In short, it’s the lubricant that keeps my wheels turning, and I think it’s required to keep driving innovation in Austin.”

What industry sectors do you focus on within Austin (and beyond)? What is happening in Austin now that you’re most excited to fund?

Over the past 15 years, S3 Ventures has primarily investing in B2B software companies (two-thirds of its portfolio are in this space). But it has also had successful exits in consumer digital experiences and healthcare.

“Texas has an incredibly diverse economy, and so the technology innovation is also broad-based,” Engineer said. “We are seeing huge sectors of the economy (financial services, real estate, health care, education, skilled trades, hospitality, industrial, energy, manufacturing) that were slower to digitize, now start to embrace cloud-based solutions across their entire organizations.”

Silverton Partners has always been a generalist fund. That said, there are several dislocations occurring at the moment that are hard for the firm to ignore, according to Flager. Specifically, he said, there’s rapid disruption in digital health, fintech /insurtech, and education. “The playbooks in these massive industries are being rewritten and we are certainly looking for entrepreneurs who have a strong point of view relative to what the future will look like,” Flager added.

Capital Factory’s Joshua Baer believes the variety of the city’s startup scene is part of what makes it so vibrant. “If it’s hot in tech, it’s happening in Austin,” he said. Some of the areas that have been big recently include artificial intelligence and machine learning, consumer packaged goods, drones, e-commerce, healthcare, marketplaces, robotics and SaaS.

Unorthodox Ventures’ Carey Smith said his firm is focused on investing in companies making tangible products that solve real problems. And unlike many other VCs in the city, and even though it’s a big part of the culture in Austin, he’s not a fan of software. “I prefer the challenge of manufacturing consumer goods,” he said. “Beyond that, software companies lack diversity and only benefit a small sliver of society with the jobs they create. Manufacturing, on the other hand, helps everyone from GEDs to PhDs.”

LiveOak Venture Partners invests across pretty much all industries. In the past year, it has backed companies in proptech, fintech, retail, supply chain, business compliance, cyber security and edtech.

Proptech, in particular, is exciting to LiveOak, and the city has seen success in companies such as Opcity and OJO Labs. Another area with big potential are startups working in legal/compliance. Disco and Mitratech are large companies headquartered in Austin and there are exciting fast growing newcomers like Osano, Eventus and Litlingo.

For Next Coast’s Floreani, the increased number of successful B2C startups in Austin hitting scale is promising “as it cements our talent pool and secret sauce beyond Austin’s early days of being know as a semiconductor and SaaS town.”

“We still have great software entrepreneurs but we also have the DNA to do consumer and media if you consider EverlyWell, Literati, FloSports, Atmosphere, to name a few,” she said.

What are some of the local challenges you’ve encountered or seen founders struggle with? More generally, how should people looking to hire in, invest in, or relocate to Austin think about doing business in the city?

The general consensus among local investors is that Austin’s tech community is welcoming and collaborative and that they all went to serve as a resource to anyone thinking of moving to the city. S3 Ventures’ Engineer said his firm has had several recent transplants from both coasts share how they were pleasantly surprised by this culture – especially compared to what they were used to.

Silverton’s Flager acknowledges that moving is always a challenging event, but moving during COVID is certainly a class of its own.

“I’ve seen some founders struggle with finding strong community ties after relocating to Austin in the midst of a pandemic,” he said. “Almost everything is virtual and that makes integration with a new ecosystem more difficult. Part of my role as an investor and steward of the Austin ecosystem is to facilitate more connectivity within the founder community. As the vaccine rollouts continue and in-person contact becomes safer, Silverton is planning to host a series of community building events to better integrate founders moving here.”

Capitol Factory’s Baer believes Texas investors think about loss prevention more than their peers in Silicon Valley. His advice to companies? Develop two different pitches and know who you are pitching to. “The Texas pitch talks about how you have de-risked the business and the Silicon Valley pitch talks about how big this could be if it works,” he said.

For Unorthodox Ventures’ Smith advises founders to be careful of organizations in Austin or elsewhere that look to help entrepreneurs while “taking equity and not giving enough in return to justify it.”

“Founders need to make sure they are selective about the investors and advisers they take on and that they choose people who offer more than just capital,” he said.

LiveOak Ventures’ Srinivasa warns that people in Austin are not transactional and that if you come across as being transactional and strictly interact with somebody in a transactional way and not a relational way, “it rubs people the wrong way.”

“Outsiders need to be aware of this when they come here,” he said. “When making a hiring decision, it’s important to choose someone who is a good cultural fit, and not hire based solely on resume. From an investor perspective, if you want to do business here, it’s important to focus building strong relationships, besides offering attractive deal terms.”

Next Coast Ventures’ Floreani notes that hiring growth leaders has been a consistent challenge across her firm’s portfolio. “It would be great if Austin had a deeper bench of talented marketing and sales leaders,” she said.

Who are key startup people you see creating success locally, whether investors, founders or even other types of startup ecosystems roles like lawyers, designers, growth experts, etc. We’re trying to highlight the movers and shakers who outsiders might not know.

S3: Founders/CEOs – Leo Resig (Atmosphere), Jag Bath (Favor), Kim Rodriguez (Acessa), Doug Donovan (Interplay Learning), Richard Lebovitz (LeanDNA), Adelle Archer (Eterneva), Andy Ambrose (LiveOak Technology), Adam Berman (TVA Medical), Dion Cornett (Liquibase)

Investors – Rosa McCormick (Wild Basin), Oksana Malysheva (Sputnik), Adam Lipman (Ecliptic Capital), and Josh Baer / Bryan Chambers (Capital Factory)

Service Providers – Marc Nathan (E/N), John Gump (CBRE), Lathrop Smith (MLR), Austin Willis (SVB), Paul O’Brien (Mediatech)

Silverton: Heather Brunner and Jason Cohen @ WP Engine, Chuck Gordon and Mario Feghali @ Sparefoot, Jess Ewing @ Literati, Blake Garrett @Aceable, James Garvey @ Self Financial, Brian Cruver @ Alert Media, John Banczak and T.J. Clark @ TurnKey, Michelle Davey @ Wheel, Rob Taylor @ Convey and several others. 

Capital Factory: http://baer.ly/austinabc

Unorthodox Ventures: Christa Freeland built ATX Kit, a startup that supports more than 40 local food entrepreneurs with her Austin-centric snack boxes.

Bob Bridge and the Southwest Angel Network (SWAN) support startups aiming to solve serious societal challenges, including environmental, health and social justice issues.

LiveOak:  We are fortunate to have many movers and shakers here in our network. We do not wish to include one at the expense of another; that being said, we do want to recognize Dan Graham, who funds social impact startups through Notley Ventures, who has launched a fund to invest in women entrepreneurs, via the BEAM Angel Network and has played an active role in the emergence of CPG. Jim Breyer has been here for only a year and in that period has been an incredible advocate in op-eds, blog posts and interviews for Austin, the local startups and the energy of this town. That has been a big positive addition.

NextCoast Ventures: The founders of these startups have incredible growth plans for Austin: EverlyWell, Upequity, Steadily, Eterneva, Literati, FloSports, and Enboarder. Please note I may be a bit biased here as most of these are companies we have backed.

What do you think of comparisons to Silicon Valley? What impact do you think the influx of (big & small) tech companies is having on the city’s startup scene?

S3’s Engineer believes there is only one Silicon Valley, and that it is highly unlikely there will be anything comparable in the Western world.

But he thinks that while much smaller today, if the trends continue over the next ten years, the Texas ecosystem has a real shot at growing as large, if not larger, than New York and Boston.

Silverton’s Flager was born and raised in Silicon Valley. He went to school there and worked there as well. As a result, he’s not a big fan of the comparison.

“Each place is distinct with different pros and cons,” he said. “Will Austin ever overtake Silicon Valley in terms of size and activity? I really don’t know — we certainly have a long way to go. To some extent, I’m not sure that matters.”

What he does care about is that Austin retains its vibrant character and that its current growth enriches the city, rather than dilutes its energy. “It’s important to recognize that Austin’s culture has not been tech-centric,” Flager said. “Austin is a unique powerhouse of live music, great food, arts, outdoor living and ‘keeping it weird.’ ”

He adds: “As I contemplate what I admire about Silicon Valley and all the things Austin needs to do to be at that level, I tend to spend as much time thinking about what we could do differently.”

Unorthodox Ventures’ Smith believes it’s no surprise that “everyone wants to leave Silicon Valley.

“They finally figured out it’s a disaster,” he said. “As more intelligent, hardworking and curious people gather here, it’s a good thing for Austin and for VCs more broadly. One of the problems with Silicon Valley is that such a strong percentage of VC money stays there or in New York or Boston. We need more capital in Austin and other innovative cities throughout Middle America where we’re solving real problems for the everyday American. As Austin feels more and more influence from Silicon Valley, it’s so important to fund more than tech-oriented projects. Venture capitalists need to focus on basic human needs, too.”

LiveOak’s Srinivasa knows that comparisons to Silicon Valley are inevitable, and for the most part welcome when those comparisons bring broader national and international attention to Austin and reinforces its reputation as a city with a booming startup scene.

“There’s a lot of vibrancy and momentum to the startup scene here that is reminiscent of the early days of Silicon Valley — the growing number businesses being launched, the number of companies being funded, the amount of talent flowing here eager to engrain themselves in the tech community,” he said. “Yet we know there is something unique to Austin that sets it apart from any other tech hub—the collaborative spirit of the people here. There’s also an energy and excitement in this community that’s palpable. Austin has great respect for the successes Silicon Valley has brought forth, and we will incorporate their positive aspects, while forging our own path.”

Next Coast’s Floreani believes that comparison has been overused for a decade. “We are not Silicon Valley and will never be it,” she says. “I am not saying that in a negative sense. I grew up in the Bay Area. I simply believe we grow companies differently here and even though more SV talent and investors are coming to town I don’t think we will suddenly shift to a more Valley like approach to growing companies like blitz-scaling. Rather I think we will find a happy medium that incorporates fast growth and sustainability.”

09 Apr 2021

So you want to raise a Series A

During a seed funding round, a founder needs to convince a venture capital investor on a vision. But during a Series A fundraise, napkin-stage ideas don’t make the cut — a founder needs product progress, numbers, and revenue (or at least a plan to eventually generate some).

In many ways, the stakes are higher for a Series A — and Bucky Moore, a partner at Kleiner Perkins, joined TechCrunch Early Stage last week to give founders tactical advice on the process of raising one.

Moore spoke about storytelling over semantics, pricing, and where his firm sees itself “raising the bar” for startups.

Here are a few key points; a full video and a transcript of the entire conversation are linked at the bottom.


Explain to investors why you are raising now

More companies will raise seed rounds than Series A rounds, simply due to the fact that many startups fail, and venture only makes sense for a small fraction of businesses out there. Every check is a new cycle of convincing and proving that you, as a startup, will have venture-scale returns. Moore explained that startups looking to move to their next round need to explain to investors why now is their moment.

The way I think about “why now” is [that] it is an opportunity for you as a founder to convey a unique insight and understanding of your market opportunity, the history of the space that you’re in, why companies have succeeded or failed in that space, historically speaking, and what are the known challenges from a go-to-market perspective; what headwinds will you be up against at a macro level. These are all things that I think people like me get really excited about when hearing unique insight from founders, because it suggests that they’ve really studied their market opportunity, and they understand it. (Timestamp: 2:19)